Re: Experimental Research In Education: The Most Exciting Talk at the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings
- From: Art Kendall <Arthur.Kendall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:10:13 GMT
comments:
Since it is impossible to randomly assign to race, any analysis would have to be quasi-experimental (aka non-experimental, aka observational),
In quasi-experimental work a great deal of the work is to rule out plausible rival hypotheses that would be ruled out by a random assignment to treatment. The link below identifies many of these plausible rival hypotheses.
http://appliedpersonnelresearch.com/papers/adimpact.pdf
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants
Donald Macnaughton wrote:
Referring to my February 11 post, Michael Granaas wrote.
(in EdStat)
I am wondering why this is being circulated. The opening comments don't provide me with an adequate context to judge whether I should just be reading for information or if there is a desire for comments.
I would be very interested in and appreciative of any comments that readers have about the ideas. The full post is at
http://www.matstat.com/teach/p0048.htm
I'm especially interested in comments about the discussion of whether human performance or behavior can be predicted from a person's race. That discussion is available at http://www.matstat.com/teach/p0048.htm#AppC
Don Macnaughton
- References:
- Experimental Research In Education: The Most Exciting Talk at the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings
- From: Donald Macnaughton
- Experimental Research In Education: The Most Exciting Talk at the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings
- Prev by Date: Re: Binomial dta: how to handle don't-cares?
- Next by Date: Re: Binomial dta: how to handle don't-cares?
- Previous by thread: Experimental Research In Education: The Most Exciting Talk at the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings
- Next by thread: Bayesian updating of information
- Index(es):
Loading