Re: Really Dumb Question...
- From: "Kevin E. Thorpe" <kevin.thorpe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:26:18 -0700
On Jun 13, 5:50 pm, mcap <mca...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear All:
I know this is not a great question but I am curious. Here
goes.......
If power is the ability to detect a significant difference given
that one exits, then why is it important to evaluate it in studies
where a significant difference was actually found (null was
rejected). Is it because the rejection was based on the sample data
but but the hypothesis refers to a theoretical population where the
null is not true - two different things?
I know there is a bias towards type I errors in publication and
not enough attention paid to type II errors......
Thanks,
Marc
What you are describing is sometimes called "post-hoc power."
In my opinion, it is a pointless exercise no matter what
the study outcome.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Really Dumb Question...
- From: Gaj Vidmar
- Re: Really Dumb Question...
- References:
- Really Dumb Question...
- From: mcap
- Really Dumb Question...
- Prev by Date: Really Dumb Question...
- Next by Date: Re: Really Dumb Question...
- Previous by thread: Really Dumb Question...
- Next by thread: Re: Really Dumb Question...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|