Re: SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?

From: monia9PL <moleksiak@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:07:30 -0000

Rich

Could you explain me why a standardized coefficient must be in [-1,1]?
Possibly, I lost somewhere understanding of standardization :(

Thank you
Monika

Why not? Because they were declared to be standardized.
A second variable has to be implicated.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?
  - From: Richard Ulrich

References:
- SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?
  - From: srbraithwaite@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?
  - From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?
  - From: monia9PL
- Re: SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?
  - From: Richard Ulrich

Prev by Date: Re: S-plus question (loading from the file)
Next by Date: Re: SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?
Previous by thread: Re: SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?
Next by thread: Re: SEM: Standardized path weight greater than 1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread