Re: logistic regression question
- From: Ray Koopman <koopman@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:14:58 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 1, 8:03 am, amorphia <spam.onto...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have an experimental design where subjects make a sequence of simple
binary choices A or B. I would like to test the hypothesis that
initially in the sequence subjects tend to choose A, but this bias
degrades to random (or perhaps a bias to B) as the sequence
progresses.
Initially I thought that maybe I could do a simple binary logistic
regression, with sequence position as the only covariate. But now I
think that this is probably invalid, because this would assume that
choices at sequence position t+1 are independent of choices at
sequence t. This assumption is plainly false because the choices are
made by the same individuals who may make runs of the same choice.
Can I solve this problem by including individual as a factor in the
model perhaps? Or is a more complicated solution necessary?
Yes, making the additive constant in the logistic equation
person-specific, so that it becomes 'a_i' instead of just 'a',
would be one way to attack the problem.
Another approach would be to use Cochran's Q test -- don't omit
the df-adjustment for non-sphericity -- with pairwise McNemar
tests on the positions.
.
- References:
- logistic regression question
- From: amorphia
- logistic regression question
- Prev by Date: Re: logistic regression question
- Next by Date: using the chi-square goodness of fit test for large cell counts
- Previous by thread: Re: logistic regression question
- Next by thread: Re: logistic regression question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|