Re: Missing Data
- From: Gary <LanceGary@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 02:06:35 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 9, 6:03 am, Richard Ulrich <Rich.Ulr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:52:49 -0800 (PST), Gary <LanceG...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
[snip, previous]
Thanks for the references and web sites. Much appreciated.
Anyone got any suggestions as to how missing data procedures should be
implemented?
- with plenty of options for the user, so that the user
*knows* that there were plenty of options that were not used?
"With humility"?
What kind of answer did you expect?
--
Rich Ulrich
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
Oh I was thinking of a discussion in another forum about how missing
data procedures should be implemented...
Thanks
lance
.
- References:
- Missing Data
- From: Gary
- Re: Missing Data
- From: Bruce Weaver
- Re: Missing Data
- From:
- Re: Missing Data
- From: Bruce Weaver
- Re: Missing Data
- From: Gary
- Re: Missing Data
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Missing Data
- Prev by Date: Re: Missing Data
- Next by Date: Need an example to apply SEM to data
- Previous by thread: Re: Missing Data
- Next by thread: Re: Missing Data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|