Re: Comparing predictors
From: Ross Clement (clemenr_at_wmin.ac.uk)
Date: 06/26/04
- Next message: Herman Rubin: "Re: continous state markov"
- Previous message: extrasense: "Re: Probability of the Life on Mars, simple math"
- In reply to: Ross Clement: "Re: Comparing predictors"
- Next in thread: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Comparing predictors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Jun 2004 17:00:26 -0700
clemenr@wmin.ac.uk (Ross Clement) wrote in message news:<e5b5d377.0406250709.4603faaa@posting.google.com>...
> Lionel Barnett <mail@lionelb.com> wrote in message news:<2k24skF16dfdnU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> > The figures are:
> >
> > corr(Y',Y'') = 0.8851
> > corr(Y'-Y,Y''-Y) = 0.9991 (!)
>
> I must say that I agree with the addition of the exclamation mark to
> your figures. I'm not quite sure how you get a correlation for the
> error so much higher than the correlation of the raw values. By that I
> mean that I'm doubting my own knowledge, rather than your results.
After a quick check, it appears that if your residuals are perfectly
correlated, but of different magnitude, that you can get the pattern
of correlations above. Doing a quick test in R:
> y <- rnorm( 1000, 100, 20 )
1000 items of (output) data
> residuals <- rnorm( 1000, 0, 3 )
normally distributed residuals
> pred1 <- y + residuals
one predicator
> pred2 <- y + residuals * 5
second predictor with perfectly correlated, but larger magnitude,
residuals
> cor( pred1, pred2 )
[1] 0.8779349
correlation coefficient of raw predicted values
> cor( pred1-y, pred2-y )
[1] 1
correlation coefficient of residuals.
Cheers,
Ross-c
- Next message: Herman Rubin: "Re: continous state markov"
- Previous message: extrasense: "Re: Probability of the Life on Mars, simple math"
- In reply to: Ross Clement: "Re: Comparing predictors"
- Next in thread: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Comparing predictors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|