Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy
From: Radford Neal (radford_at_cs.toronto.edu)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: Aleks Jakulin: "Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy"
- Previous message: ylboy: "sum of Bernoulli trials"
- In reply to: Aleks Jakulin: "Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy"
- Next in thread: Aleks Jakulin: "Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy"
- Reply: Aleks Jakulin: "Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Aug 2004 15:13:35 GMT
>> If it helps, we can focus the question by posing the specific
>> of coinflipping. If one observes 6 heads out of 10 flips of a
>> potentially biased coin, then one can use standard Bayesian methods...
>>
>> How would this be affected according to a Maximum Entropy approach?
In article <cgl2ei$mso$1@planja.arnes.si>,
Aleks Jakulin <a_jakulin@@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>With the constraint of having two outcomes, MaxEnt would yield you the
>PMF of [0.5,0.5].
Why? The data is 6 heads out of 10, not 5 out of 10. Shouldn't the
best distribution pay at least a little attention to the data?
I suspect you have in mind some sort of frequentist test that fails to
reject the null hypothesis that the distribution is [0.5,0.5], and
since this distribution has maximum entropy, you go for it. Of
course, you WILL reject this null if you set the significance level
high enough. So the maximum entropy result, often touted as being an
"objective" solution to the problem, actually depends on a totally
arbitrary choice of significance level.
Radford Neal
- Next message: Aleks Jakulin: "Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy"
- Previous message: ylboy: "sum of Bernoulli trials"
- In reply to: Aleks Jakulin: "Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy"
- Next in thread: Aleks Jakulin: "Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy"
- Reply: Aleks Jakulin: "Re: Explanation of Maximum Entropy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|