Re: importance of statistics in computer science
From: Ross Clement (clemenr_at_wmin.ac.uk)
Date: 09/22/04
- Next message: sean kim: "Re: what statistics is appropriate for randomly perturbed dynamical system"
- Previous message: Anon.: "Re: Help with simple probability question!! Excellent question."
- In reply to: Richard Ulrich: "Re: importance of statistics in computer science"
- Next in thread: Richard Ulrich: "Re: importance of statistics in computer science"
- Reply: Richard Ulrich: "Re: importance of statistics in computer science"
- Reply: Will Dwinnell: "Re: importance of statistics in computer science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Sep 2004 02:15:14 -0700
My take on it would be that statistics is very important for Computer
Science, and has two main roles (there are probably others).
Like any science, Computer Science frequently involves the analysis of
data, either from experiments, or from observing computer systems.
Like any science, Statistics is vital for interpreting and analysing
experimental or survey data.
Paul Cohen's book _Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence_ is a
good book, and despite the title, I think it would be a useful read
across wide ranges of computer science. I haven't seen the book that
Rich suggests, and hence can't comment on it.
Secondly, statistical methods are frequently used in the design of
computer systems. Choosing an example which is obviously statistics
rather than being based on probability theory, Anna Hart designed a
system for building decision trees (a form of knowledge-based
programming) which made extensive use of chi-square sigificance tests.
Personally I think that statistical, or probability theory, methods
should be used in some cases where fuzzy logic is used at present, but
have no proof of that :-) It's also not uncommon to see "seat of the
pants" algorithms that could be improved if the author was more
familiar with more formal mathematical approaches. An example of this
(though for information theory rather than stats) is that Decision
Trees (at least as they were developed in AI, there was a parallel
development in Stats) originally used 'seat of the pants' heuristics,
but after a suggestion (I can't remember by who) was made to Ross
Quinlin, heuristics based on information theory were adopted.
Cheers,
Ross-c
- Next message: sean kim: "Re: what statistics is appropriate for randomly perturbed dynamical system"
- Previous message: Anon.: "Re: Help with simple probability question!! Excellent question."
- In reply to: Richard Ulrich: "Re: importance of statistics in computer science"
- Next in thread: Richard Ulrich: "Re: importance of statistics in computer science"
- Reply: Richard Ulrich: "Re: importance of statistics in computer science"
- Reply: Will Dwinnell: "Re: importance of statistics in computer science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|