Re: PP vs. ICA
From: Aleks Jakulin (a_jakulin_at_@hotmail.com)
Date: 09/23/04
- Next message: Martin Penderis: "Re: Which prices are fake?"
- Previous message: Rithban: "Re: Not sure how to approach this. (did stats 15 years ago)"
- In reply to: Jay Liu: "Re: PP vs. ICA"
- Next in thread: Gottfried Helms: "Re: PP vs. ICA"
- Reply: Gottfried Helms: "Re: PP vs. ICA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:14:01 +0200
Jay Liu wrote:
> However, from the viewpoint of a problem formulation, two are almost
> identical. As you know we can formulate ICA and PP in terms of
> optimization problems. Basis vectors are the optimization variables
> be determined. Non-gaussianity such as negative entropy can be used
> a performance index (or objective function) in both ICA and PP.
I mostly agree with you. However, even if others too say the same as
you about the similarity, I personally find the formulations of PP and
ICA quite different:
PP: a single highly "dependent" multivariate sub-distribution
ICA: several mutually independent univariate distributions
reconstructing the whole distribution
Almost everything is a kind of an optimization problem... PP and ICA
are both usually implemented with similar kinds of loss functions
(dependence, independence, entropy, etc), but that's as far as the
similarity goes.
-- mag. Aleks Jakulin http://www.ailab.si/aleks/ Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
- Next message: Martin Penderis: "Re: Which prices are fake?"
- Previous message: Rithban: "Re: Not sure how to approach this. (did stats 15 years ago)"
- In reply to: Jay Liu: "Re: PP vs. ICA"
- Next in thread: Gottfried Helms: "Re: PP vs. ICA"
- Reply: Gottfried Helms: "Re: PP vs. ICA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]