Re: Statistical Ranking for Non-Normal Populations
From: Peter Hach (Willy.Yoda_at_gmx.net)
Date: 10/15/04
- Next message: Peter Hach: "Re: Statistical Ranking for Non-Normal Populations"
- Previous message: Osher Doctorow: "Re: Fibonacci-Lucas vs Markov Chain vs Riccati"
- In reply to: George Kahrimanis: "Re: Statistical Ranking for Non-Normal Populations"
- Next in thread: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Statistical Ranking for Non-Normal Populations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 21:07:30 +0000 (UTC)
>
>Again, thanks for the problem! Now I am also interested in the
>practical aspects of this data, like what is it about, what
>is the use, why sampling is expensive... or is it only a scenario?
>
Very interesting - many thanks for the long answer!
This is not only a scenario; but a real problem related to statistical
ranking of configrations. I want to run a number of different tasks
t1...tn on a computer system for which I have a number of different
configurations C1,...,Cm; running each task to get the real time taken
is expensive, and they may vary in cost significantly.
The main reason why I was looking for different theory than what
people have used in statistical ranking is that here it seems that
generally most papers assume that one samples from a normal and while
I'm willing to sample sufficiently often for the CLT to hold for the
sample mean, sampling sufficiently often to get a number of means (for
batches of samples) that correspond to a sample from an (approximate)
normal distribution seems excessive (and since the distribution of the
X[i] is non-normal still vulnerable to outliers).
Since my background in statistics is limited, my intuition may be
wrong, or I may have simply not looked at the right sources, however.
- Next message: Peter Hach: "Re: Statistical Ranking for Non-Normal Populations"
- Previous message: Osher Doctorow: "Re: Fibonacci-Lucas vs Markov Chain vs Riccati"
- In reply to: George Kahrimanis: "Re: Statistical Ranking for Non-Normal Populations"
- Next in thread: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Statistical Ranking for Non-Normal Populations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|