Re: Theory question on kolmogorov-smirnov
From: Glen (glenbarnett_at_geocities.com)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Anon.: "Re: "Sphere the data""
- Previous message: Marc Schwartz: "Re: Fitting a Guassian function in R?"
- In reply to: AJ: "Theory question on kolmogorov-smirnov"
- Next in thread: Vadim Pliner: "Re: Theory question on kolmogorov-smirnov"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Oct 2004 23:09:16 -0700
AJ <99atlantic@gmail.com> wrote in message news:<ggzfd.38382$Pl.31116@pd7tw1no>...
> For the normal_CDF(x), is that normal using mean 0, variance of 1, or using
> the paramaters from the list that comprises the x's. so mean(x), stdev(x) ?
The K-S is a test for a completely specified distribution - so you use
the mean and variance given in the null hypothesis.
If you want to do it for a general normal (i.e. unspecified
parameters), the distribution of the KS test statistic is no longer
appropriate. The corresponding "fit the parameters" version of the K-S
for the normal is called the Lilliefors test.
Glen
- Next message: Anon.: "Re: "Sphere the data""
- Previous message: Marc Schwartz: "Re: Fitting a Guassian function in R?"
- In reply to: AJ: "Theory question on kolmogorov-smirnov"
- Next in thread: Vadim Pliner: "Re: Theory question on kolmogorov-smirnov"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]