Re: Sorry, posted twice yesterday
From: Richard Ulrich (Rich.Ulrich_at_comcast.net)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: shankar: "Re: Model-based source separation"
- Previous message: Jeff: "Re: Principal Components Analysis"
- In reply to: Zeno Franco: "Sorry, posted twice yesterday"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:00:31 -0500
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:59:21 +0000 (UTC), zfranco@pgsp.edu (Zeno
Franco) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry, I thought the first post I made yesterday on Kruskal-Wallis vs.
> logistic regression didn't make it through, so posted it again, which
> might be confusing.
>
> If anybody has any thoughts about this, it would be a big help.
>
You posted yesterday in sci.stat.consult.
There was a good response yesterday, pointing out
that your requested about information did not make
particularly good sense.
Ties don't call for the K-W.
-- Rich Ulrich, wpilib@pitt.edu http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
- Next message: shankar: "Re: Model-based source separation"
- Previous message: Jeff: "Re: Principal Components Analysis"
- In reply to: Zeno Franco: "Sorry, posted twice yesterday"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]