does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?
From: kiki (lunaliu3_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/26/04
- Next message: Colin Rose: "Re: Computing the Nth moments"
- Previous message: treks: "probability of one pair in a hand of 5"
- Next in thread: ted: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: ted: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: Randy Yates: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: Prasanna: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: Tim Wescott: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: Country_Chiel: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 19:40:23 -0800
Hi all,
I read through several books but did not get clarification on whether
WGN(white Gaussian noise process) imply zero mean or not...
Another confusion I have is that the definition of WGN is it has flat power
spectrum density, let's say S(f)=1, then Rx(t)=delta(t) is its
autocorrelation function, I don't see how people say the power of this noise
process is E((x(t))^2)=sigma_x, something like that... the power should be
infinite, right?
Any clarifications? Thanks a lot!
- Next message: Colin Rose: "Re: Computing the Nth moments"
- Previous message: treks: "probability of one pair in a hand of 5"
- Next in thread: ted: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: ted: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: Randy Yates: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: Prasanna: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: Tim Wescott: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Reply: Country_Chiel: "Re: does WGN(white Gaussian noise) imple zero mean?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|