Re: logistic regression
From: Richard Ulrich (Rich.Ulrich_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: dave_at_autobox.com: "Re: Comparing Forecasting Models"
- Previous message: Bruce Weaver: "Re: logistic regression"
- In reply to: raed shatnawi: "logistic regression"
- Next in thread: Thom: "Re: logistic regression"
- Reply: Thom: "Re: logistic regression"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:36:59 -0500
- here's a wordier answer -
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:34:27 -0600, "raed shatnawi"
<rshatnaw@cs.uah.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> what is the best book that explains multivariate statistics?
Where are you starting?
When you browse in a dozen stat textbooks in the
library, which ones seemed to make the most sense?
- You might find something good by browsing, but,
too often, the best books are already on-loan. IF you
say what seems good, someone might say what seems
similar, but better.
>
> can anyone explain to me the difference between least sqaure regression and
> logistic regression?
The "logit" is defined as log (p/q) where q=(1-p), and
p is the probability for a dichotomous variable which
has been observed or estimated for a group.
[You might look up "probit" for comparison.]
You can use Y= < 0 or 1 > as criterion in Ordinary Least Squares.
There's an obvious problem in trying to replace that with
a simple transformation for an individual, rather than
a group, as log(p/q) -- "Logistic regression" (LR) has easy
solutions (like OLS) when the data are expressed as groups
where p is not 0 or 1. And logistic regression requires
a more subtle solution, when the data are presented
as individuals whose scores are 0 or 1, since you can't
take the log of 0 or infinite.
Practically speaking, there is often very little difference
in tests or prediction between OLS regression on 0/1
outcome, and LR by maximum likelihood methods.
LR usually represents the more appropriate theoretical
model So far as I know, the computer programs for Logistic
regression all remain less effective at warnings and
diagnostics than what you can get on OLS regression.
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
- Next message: dave_at_autobox.com: "Re: Comparing Forecasting Models"
- Previous message: Bruce Weaver: "Re: logistic regression"
- In reply to: raed shatnawi: "logistic regression"
- Next in thread: Thom: "Re: logistic regression"
- Reply: Thom: "Re: logistic regression"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|