Re: Set Repeatability
ravenous.wolves_at_gmail.com
Date: 02/03/05
- Next message: Robert Israel: "Re: Help with simple statistical test"
- Previous message: W. Wat son: "Re: Probability Theory--A Science?"
- In reply to: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Next in thread: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Reply: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Feb 2005 10:59:07 -0800
Any idea how to apply this same concept for correlation between two
tools? For example, suppose on T1 and T2 I get the following (column
totals / nRuns) for F1/F2.
F1:
1 = .9
2 = 1.0
3 = .1
4 = .2
5 = .2
6 = 1.0
F2:
1 = .9
2 = .9
3 = .9
4 = .2
5 = .8
7 = .1
I was planning to take the 1.0 - the absolute difference for each
discrete value and average them, but after doing repeatability wrong, I
thought I should check whether this is statistically sound.
A1 = 1.0 - ABS(0.9 - 0.9) = 1.0
A2 = 1.0 - ABS(1.0 - 0.9) = 0.9
A3 = 1.0 - ABS(0.1 - 0.9) = 0.2
A4 = 1.0 - ABS(0.2 - 0.2) = 1.0
A5 = 1.0 - ABS(0.2 - 0.8) = 0.4
A6 = 1.0 - ABS(1.0 - 0.0) = 0.0
A7 = 1.0 - ABS(0.0 - 0.1) = 0.9
A-Avg = 0.628
However, this doesn't look right, as the # of low-frequency values
which appear on only one tool increase (such as A7), the correlation
score trends upwards since A7 is judged as having high correlation
since both tools tended to not find it. This is the same problem my
earlier repeatibility formula had :(
Thanks,
-ken
- Next message: Robert Israel: "Re: Help with simple statistical test"
- Previous message: W. Wat son: "Re: Probability Theory--A Science?"
- In reply to: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Next in thread: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Reply: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]