Re: Get rid of Tables
Large_Nassau_Grouper_at_Yahoo.com
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Large_Nassau_Grouper_at_Yahoo.com: "Re: An unbiased estimator of mu^2"
- Previous message: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Ranking score"
- In reply to: Luis A. Afonso: "Get rid of Tables"
- Next in thread: scdsc: "Re: Get rid of Tables"
- Reply: scdsc: "Re: Get rid of Tables"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Feb 2005 21:10:27 -0800
"Luis A. Afonso" wrote:
> Get rid of Tables (a quite presumptuous title)
>
Not really.
> Do use a program that evaluate de Cumulative Normal Distribution
There are many of those around.
> Get exact 7 decimal places values:
Don't you mean the approximate value correct to 7 decimal places?
>
> Provides de Integrals: Example: z=1.2345678
But when would you ever have the need to have that many decimals
in the value of z?
>
> from 0 to z 0.3915043
> from -z to z 0.7830086
> < = z 0.8915043
or, more accurately, .8915043004722... and I have a program on
my PC, named ET (Electronic Tables) that can calculate the tail
areas of most of the commonly used probability distributions
(normal, Student t, F chi-square, exponential, Weibull, lognormal,
noncenral chi-sq, gamma, beta, ...) up to 100 places of decimal
accuracy. But who needs it???
-- Bob.
- Next message: Large_Nassau_Grouper_at_Yahoo.com: "Re: An unbiased estimator of mu^2"
- Previous message: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Ranking score"
- In reply to: Luis A. Afonso: "Get rid of Tables"
- Next in thread: scdsc: "Re: Get rid of Tables"
- Reply: scdsc: "Re: Get rid of Tables"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|