Re: Set Repeatability
ravenous.wolves_at_gmail.com
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Get rid of Tables"
- Previous message: Gordon Sande: "Re: median of combined sets?"
- In reply to: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Next in thread: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Reply: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Feb 2005 07:13:21 -0800
It's possible for points in the same run to be less than the proximity
tolerance apart. The closest two points in the same run could be would
be 5um, with a standard proximity tolerance being 10um, but anywhere
from 10-50 are workable values.
Currently, if more than 1 point from a single run is within the
tolerance of one point in the master list (and only one point), then
the closest point is chosen to match with the one from the master list,
and the others are added to the master list as unique points.
Quantizing to a fixed grid introduces the problem where points may be
very close in terms of proximity, but fall into adjacent cells.
I don't know how to handle (in a meaningful way) points from a single
run that are "the same" either based on the proximity tolerance
threshold or a fixed grid framework. These should be a small percentage
of the population in general, but I don't have a handle on how frequent
these cases are appearing in my current data sets.
Thanks,
-ken
- Next message: Richard Ulrich: "Re: Get rid of Tables"
- Previous message: Gordon Sande: "Re: median of combined sets?"
- In reply to: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Next in thread: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Reply: Ray Koopman: "Re: Set Repeatability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|