Re: Fallacy of Hypothesis Testing
From: illywhacker (illywhacker_at_free.fr)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: illywhacker: "Re: Fallacy of Hypothesis Testing"
- Previous message: Josh: "Re: Relative Entropy"
- In reply to: Luis A. Afonso: "Re: Fallacy of Hypothesis Testing"
- Next in thread: Allen McIntosh: "Re: Fallacy of Hypothesis Testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Feb 2005 04:18:54 -0800
Probability theory is not concerned with 'random experiments', whatever
they are: this severely restricts its range of application. It is an
extension of logic to uncertain knowledge; it reduces to logic in the
case that all probabilities are 0 or 1. Thus your 'logic operation' is
already included in probability theory, as my previous post showed.
illywhacker;
- Next message: illywhacker: "Re: Fallacy of Hypothesis Testing"
- Previous message: Josh: "Re: Relative Entropy"
- In reply to: Luis A. Afonso: "Re: Fallacy of Hypothesis Testing"
- Next in thread: Allen McIntosh: "Re: Fallacy of Hypothesis Testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]