Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: "Unknown" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:02:04 +0100
>>
> Well, it's one I would go for. It's time to trot out the well known
> G.E.P. Box quote: "All models are wrong, but some are useful". This
> suggests that "best" is not a good criterion (because it'll never be right
> anyway, and there are an infinite number of models you could try). I
> suppose the criterion used in practice is "good enough". And we try to
> discourage people from putting a number on that as well.
>
> Bob
>
Yes, and I guess that would explain the fact why there are over 100
distributions out there when one could have "good enough" results with the
Normal distribution right?
V.Z.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Anon.
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Glen
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- References:
- Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Glen
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Anon.
- Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Prev by Date: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Next by Date: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Previous by thread: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Next by thread: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|