Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: glenbarnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Glen)
- Date: 7 Apr 2005 19:28:41 -0700
"Unknown" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:<d343js$h3g$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
> Yes, and I guess that would explain the fact why there are over 100
> distributions out there when one could have "good enough" results with the
> Normal distribution right?
A **lot** more than 100. You think it's a long way down to the corner
shop, but that's peanuts compared to the number of distributions. Not
all of them have names, though.
Glen
.
- References:
- Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Glen
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Anon.
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Prev by Date: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Next by Date: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Previous by thread: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Next by thread: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|