Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: "Anon." <bob.ohara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:38:49 +0300
Unknown wrote:
Well, it's one I would go for. It's time to trot out the well known G.E.P. Box quote: "All models are wrong, but some are useful". This suggests that "best" is not a good criterion (because it'll never be right anyway, and there are an infinite number of models you could try). I suppose the criterion used in practice is "good enough". And we try to discourage people from putting a number on that as well.
Bob
Yes, and I guess that would explain the fact why there are over 100 distributions out there when one could have "good enough" results with the Normal distribution right?
No, they exist be cause the normal distribution is often not good enough.
Bob
-- Bob O'Hara Department of Mathematics and Statistics P.O. Box 68 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2b) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki Finland
Telephone: +358-9-191 51479 Mobile: +358 50 599 0540 Fax: +358-9-191 51400 WWW: http://www.RNI.Helsinki.FI/~boh/ Journal of Negative Results - EEB: www.jnr-eeb.org .
- References:
- Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Glen
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Anon.
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Prev by Date: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Next by Date: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Previous by thread: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Next by thread: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|