Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Herman Rubin)
- Date: 11 Apr 2005 08:50:34 -0500
In article <d343js$h3g$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Unknown <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Well, it's one I would go for. It's time to trot out the well known
>> G.E.P. Box quote: "All models are wrong, but some are useful". This
>> suggests that "best" is not a good criterion (because it'll never be right
>> anyway, and there are an infinite number of models you could try). I
>> suppose the criterion used in practice is "good enough". And we try to
>> discourage people from putting a number on that as well.
>> Bob
>Yes, and I guess that would explain the fact why there are over 100
>distributions out there when one could have "good enough" results with the
>Normal distribution right?
Whether the normal distribution gives good enough results
depends on the problem. For regression, under mild conditions,
assuming normality is of little importance. For deciding
what is an outlier, it is of great importance. For being
confident about the tails, or in setting up an IQ scale,
it is of very great importance.
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.
- References:
- Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Anon.
- Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- From: Unknown
- Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Prev by Date: Re: P-value from chi-square value: source code
- Next by Date: Re: Adding unknown independent distributions
- Previous by thread: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Next by thread: Re: Goodness of fit measures for a distribution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|