Re: Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2005 17:02:44 -0700
Luis A. Afonso wrote:
> Bob
>
>
> Thank you for the reply.
> I use M.C. since 83-84. I need not to be persuaded that the method is
useful.
> Bob wrote:
> <Good pseudorandom generators are. virtually indistinguishable from
those .... >
> I agree.
>
> There are some questions I would like to ask about testing PRG:
This is quite a bit of discussion of some topics related to your
questions,
between Herman Rubin and myself, in the thread "Central Limit Theorem"
(the
latter part of that thread) that went onto the tangent of Monte Carlo
Methods, pseudorandom number generation, testing, etc.
Read waht's there, and some of the books on the subject referenced by
me.
That should be more than enough to answer your questions, IMO.
-- Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- From: David A. Heisaer
- Re: Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- References:
- Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- Prev by Date: Re: Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- Next by Date: Bootstrap and permutation
- Previous by thread: Re: Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- Next by thread: Re: Testing a Pseudo-Random Generator
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
