Re: question about nth moment method


Gah, I should say "non-negative", not positive. That is, E([X-E(X)]^2),
being the expectation of a square, must be non-negative, which is
enough to see the first is true..

Anyway, see if you can establish that inequality with k I suggest
above. Then see what that does for you...

Glen

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: solving |something| < somethingelse
    ... > If we have an inequality of the form ... > Can we square both sides and not have to back check (since both sides ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • solving |something| < somethingelse
    ... If we have an inequality of the form ... Can we square both sides and not have to back check (since both sides ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Puzzle: Double smaller-too
    ... Hmm... ... very elegant that square trick, as you may consider any positive real ... I have not seen that inequality on the web pages of AGH-means). ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Puzzle: Double smaller-too
    ... Hmm... ... very elegant that square trick, as you may consider any positive real ... I have not seen that inequality on the web pages of AGH-means). ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: stochastic differential equations
    ... martingale with respect to the filtration. ... the expectation of the square is not equal to the square of the ...
    (sci.math)