Re: When to use Fisher?
- From: G Robin Edwards <robin.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 23:04:28 +0100
In article
<13316125.1120216924131.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
\Luis A. Afonso\ <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<Snip>
> In particular reporting to the numeric example posted by Tim:
> _______23_______8
> ________5_______2
> gives p = 0.6077. This tail does not allow us to reject H0. Then the >two groups are not different. (I love numbers; blah, blah, blah, not >too much).
> ___a11___a12___a21___a22_______________________
> ___23____8______5_____2________1)__0.3604
> ___24____7______4_____3________2)__0.1947
> ___25____6______3_____4________3)__0.0545
> ___26____5______2_____5________4)__0.0075
> ___27____4______1_____6________5)__0.0005
> ___28____3______0_____7________6)__0.0000
> _____________Tail´s size______________0.6077
Sorry to be so dumb, but I don't understand this.
I thought that the smallest frequency should be decremented, so that
the table would be calculated with a22 going from 2 to 1 to 0. For me
this gives:-
Fisher's Exact Test for Var 4
Possible frequency
distributions
23 8
5 2 Probability 0.350437
22 9
6 1 Probability 0.29852
21 10
7 0 Probability 0.0938206
Total probability of distributions at least as extreme = 0.742777
Is this utter nonsense?
Robin
.
- References:
- Re: When to use Fisher?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: When to use Fisher?
- Prev by Date: Re: Isn't the Frequentist a subset or special case of Bayesianist?
- Next by Date: Re: When to use Fisher?
- Previous by thread: Re: When to use Fisher?
- Next by thread: Re: When to use Fisher?
- Index(es):