Re: test of normality
- From: "\"Luis A. Afonso\"" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:07:15 EDT
THE POINT IS THIS
<The mean gets pulled in the direction of the
< skewness. So your distribution of incomes would be < right skewed, or positively skewed.
--
< Bruce Weaver
< bweaver@xxxxxxxxxxxx
www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir
I want that you give me an example that.
[If the sample size is larger and larger] the mean gets pulled in the direction of the skewness. So your distribution of incomes would be right skewed, or positively skewed.
Do not forget (or maliciously trying to direct me to a different problem).
Remembering:
The first sample is the wages of 1 million of Americans (USA) chosen at random . The second of all of them.
Comment:
It was marvellous: if the wages in a certain State was very poor of high wages, we add the wages of other State, and other, and other, etc.
At the end 99% earned as Financial Analysts, for instance, (30$ per hour)!
Is it clear, clear?
____________licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: test of normality
- From: Bruce Weaver
- Re: test of normality
- References:
- test of normality
- From: thierry
- test of normality
- Prev by Date: Re: Orthogonal Distance Regressions in R (or anywhere else)
- Next by Date: Re: Help with statistics on US job turnover
- Previous by thread: Re: test of normality
- Next by thread: Re: test of normality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|