Re: r-Squared Question
- From: radford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Radford Neal)
- Date: 12 Jul 2005 14:20:45 GMT
In article <1121175957.796245.150510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Predictor <predictr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I am trying to undertand r-squared (the coefficient of determination)
>of regression lines. If r, which is squared to obtain r-squared, is
>the correlation between the predicted Y and the observed Y, then
>doesn't that mean that any regression line whose predicted Y is a
>perfect linear function of the observed Y has an r (and thus r-squared)
>of 1?
That's true. You may be a bit confused, however. The only way that
the predicted and observed Y can be related by a linear function is if
the predicted and observed Y are identical (ie, the linear function is
observed=predicted). You may be confusing "predicted value" with
"predictor" (also known as a covariate or explanatory variable). The
predicted value is the linear function of the covariates in which the
coefficients are those found by fitting to the data.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radford M. Neal radford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dept. of Statistics and Dept. of Computer Science radford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
University of Toronto http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~radford
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: r-Squared Question
- From: Predictor
- Re: r-Squared Question
- References:
- r-Squared Question
- From: Predictor
- r-Squared Question
- Prev by Date: Re: r-Squared Question
- Next by Date: spatial autocorrelation and binomial data
- Previous by thread: Re: r-Squared Question
- Next by thread: Re: r-Squared Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|