Re: prior distributions of estimated parameters
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Jul 2005 10:12:30 -0700
illywhacker wrote:
> Dear Leslaw,
>
> As you can imagine, I do not agree with Reef Fish. He gives no reason why he
> does not like the reference I gave you. Here are the reasons why I do like
> it.
This was what I said to the OP,
RF> I would NOT recommend reading what illywhacker has written
RF> about the subject in this thread.
I did not even see what you referenced! It was what you had WRITTEN
yourself, illywhacker that was not worth reading. You seemed to
have given a VERY GOOD reason why yourself:
>
> Jaynes' background is in physics, and he thinks like a scientist, not a
> statistician. My background too is in physics, and I appreciate his approach
> because of this.
Why should the OP learn about Bayesian STATISTICAL inference from
statisticians when there are physicists to misrepresent the view?
-- Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: prior distributions of estimated parameters
- From: illywhacker
- Re: prior distributions of estimated parameters
- References:
- prior distributions of estimated parameters
- From: Leslaw Bieniasz
- Re: prior distributions of estimated parameters
- From: illywhacker
- Re: prior distributions of estimated parameters
- From: Leslaw Bieniasz
- Re: prior distributions of estimated parameters
- From: illywhacker
- prior distributions of estimated parameters
- Prev by Date: Re: Kurtosis approximations
- Next by Date: Re: r-Squared Question
- Previous by thread: Re: prior distributions of estimated parameters
- Next by thread: Re: prior distributions of estimated parameters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|