Re: MAX of N Chi^2[nu] variates
- From: "\"Luis A. Afonso\"" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 04:31:07 EDT
Wrapped in a Latin phrase (that I do not know) the point is precisely * Karl Good Fellow * very, very simple.
Concerning RNG´s. you took the particular (i. e. bad algorithms) as a general feature. (the favorite fanatic people´s weapon).
This is wrong. Why?
Because you are speaking to people that are asking for help, and at the same time (as all of us) are self EDUCATING. Therefore they TEND to understand your opinion as a Monte Carlo total and irrevocable condemnation, which is WRONG (because it is UNFAIR).
Why your response was precisely your late one?
I agree what you said COMPLETELY and I shall keep a copy of it!
I remark, in conclusion, I would like you pay more attention to Pedagogy of your posts. O.K.?
Friendly (no bad feelings)
______luis (without Don, a Spanish word, then inappropriate to address to a Portuguese citizen. Geographical analphabetic or aggressive *tour d´esprit *, does not matter)
.
- References:
- MAX of N Chi^2[nu] variates
- From: Ronald Bloom
- MAX of N Chi^2[nu] variates
- Prev by Date: Re: We can make stats say whatever we want
- Next by Date: Is ordering of probabilities fair?
- Previous by thread: Re: MAX of N Chi^2[nu] variates
- Next by thread: Distribution with stochastic parameter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
