Re: A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- From: Jerry Dallal <gdallal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:30:55 -0500
Reef Fish wrote:
In a nutshell, that's pretty much why CCA's are rarely used in any practical situations whereas regression methods are, because one nearly always know the weights a(i) of the variables Y(i) in the objective function to be evaluated or predicted.
Actually, it's baaaaaaaaaaaack! Maybe. I think CCA underlies what's being called reduced rank regression. I'm not 100% sure, so if anyone cares to correct me, the correction will be appreciated. Otherwise, be afraid, be very afraid!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- From: gangxu_csu
- Re: A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- References:
- A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- From: gangxu_csu
- Re: A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- From: Reef Fish
- A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions on the F-Test *VS* the Chi-Square Test
- Next by Date: Re: Effect of parametrization in regularized regression
- Previous by thread: Re: A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- Next by thread: Re: A basic question on Canonical Correlation Analysis
- Index(es):