Re: A test for randomness?
- From: Stugrad98@xxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Mar 2006 22:02:34 -0800
Here might be a way of simplying this question.
Given the same parameters: 4,000,000 SAT scores with a expected
normal distribution; you do not know the mean and standard deviation
however. You have a sample of 14 test scores and you do not know if
your sample is a random, representative sample. However, you do know
that you plot these 14 scores on a normal probability plot.
Person A argues that however large his sampling error may be, he is
still safe in assuming he has a random sample because, in a broad way,
the 14 sized sample fits the expected (normal) distribution.
Person B argues that this is a non-sequitir... you cannot make *ANY*
infererence to population based on these 14 data points simply because
they fit an expected distribution type. This is not a reliable test
to see if you have a random sample; it may simply be that, given the
small sample size, you got lucky in fitting most of the data to a
normal probability graph. You cannot infer a mean and standard
deviation for the overall population from these 14 data points.
Who is right: Person A or Person B?
Thanks
-Stu
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A test for randomness?
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: A test for randomness?
- From: Russell . Martin
- Re: A test for randomness?
- From: m00es
- Re: A test for randomness?
- From: Anon.
- Re: A test for randomness?
- References:
- A test for randomness?
- From: Stugrad98
- Re: A test for randomness?
- From: Brett Magill
- Re: A test for randomness?
- From: Stugrad98
- Re: A test for randomness?
- From: Russell . Martin
- Re: A test for randomness?
- From: Stugrad98
- A test for randomness?
- Prev by Date: Re: A test for randomness?
- Next by Date: Re: On coverage probability of Confidence interval
- Previous by thread: Re: A test for randomness?
- Next by thread: Re: A test for randomness?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|