Different R^2 values with same variables



If I run linear regression with R^2 selection (in SAS) and get some
sets of variables with R^2 values. Then I took the best set of
variables (with largest R^2) and run regression with these variables
without any selection. I get different (worse) R^2 value with these
same variables than in regression with R^2 selection! How can that be
so?

Pekka

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Underestimating r
    ... > the population, due to natural selection". ... > own relative fitness, holding fixed the actions of her social partners. ... > fundamentally a regression measure. ... random variables will be something similar. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Underestimating r
    ... >> natural selection, is the product of the selection differential ... >> fundamentally a regression measure. ... >> IBD actor-actor. ... I suppose dzbar is the average amount ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express 6 Service Pack 1 (KB837009)
    ... Robert: ... talking about as to finding the regression or expanding what ever. ... > one is selected and then copy the combined selection. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)
  • Re: Selection of explanatory variables in a model
    ... I have to build a logistic regression model and I've got a couple of ... Subset Selection in Regression ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Richard Ulrich used THREE posts to distort one post in one thread
    ... That was when Richard Ulrich took it as his opening to push his ... Quackery in regression analysis. ... Those are patterns with Bob that I've noted several times. ... Linear regression might be the least ...
    (sci.stat.math)