sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: beliavsky@xxxxxxx
- Date: 7 Apr 2006 05:13:01 -0700
A moderated newsgroup devoted to the proper subject of sci.stat.math
should not be necessary, but I guess it is. If someone starts the
process rolling (there is an established Usenet procedure that I am not
familiar with), there will be at least one vote in favor, and I suspect
there will be many.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: TomC
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: TomC
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: TomC
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: TomC
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: Lou Pecora
- Why?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Can be
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Why I would prefer this News moderated
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Policy of scientific papers publication
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Sci. stat. math. must choose
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Could a mad man be self-moderated?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: Jerry Dallal
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- Prev by Date: A text that worth to be framed
- Next by Date: Re: need a good implementation of pseudorandom generators
- Previous by thread: A text that worth to be framed
- Next by thread: Re: sci.stat.math.moderated ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|