Re: Bob´s Strike and run-away

In the FIRST post of this mis-direction thread by Afonso, he wrote:

"Luis A. Afonso" wrote:
Following the Bob's a priori judgment about me: (without any bases and unprovoked):


***Let me help everyone out a bit here. Because Luis A. Afonso doesn't have the slightest idea about either the theory or the methods behind Confidence Intervals.***

I posted:

***Date: Apr 12, 2006 12:13 PM
Subject: Sample size for a proportion

Let a Bernouilli set of experiments (like coin tossing) each one with the probability p of occurring a success.
____licas (Luis A. Afonso)***

WHY Bob did not follow-up and cowardly does say anything?


Bob responded:

RF> Because Bob never read that post!

RF> Bob seldom EVER read any of Luis A. Afonso's frivolous monologues.


and gave details about what thread and post to which Bob commented
about Afonso's errors on confidence intervals.


It was in the thread whose subject was:
The <exact> C.I. for the Pearson´s Product Moment Coefficient

which had NOTHING to do with the Bernoulli experiment on coin tossing
post Afonso dragged out from his vast collection of monologues NOBODY
reads!

Alfonso> Jack wrote:

*** Regarding note 3, why is the confidence interval independent of the
data? And why would anyone be interested in confidence intervals with
confidence levels as small as 5% or 2%? Jack ***

Alfonso> My response:

Alfonso> Jack asked two things:

Afonso> The first one I cannot answer because is ill-posted:
independent from what?


Now Afonso returned and cried,

RF> 3) I do not believe (and nobody does) that Bob did not read the
post

The post in question was his Bernoulli post which had NOTHING to do
with the post and thread in which he made a fool of himself by giving a
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL without any sample DATA, in the thread

The <exact> C.I. for the Pearson´s Product Moment Coefficient


Isn't it amazing how Luis A. Afonso could juxtipost so many different
errors of his in an attempt to fool those who don't read his posts?

Afonso, telling LIES is your favorite hobby, besides putting foot in
your mouth.

But you failed badly in your LIES, because you're so easily exposed
for your cheap LIES while at the same time re-expose your same
ERRORS.

As I had mentioned in my FIRST follow-up to this thread, what
Afonso cited

***Let me help everyone out a bit here. Because Luis A. Afonso doesn't
have the slightest idea about either the theory or the methods behind
Confidence Intervals.***

was from still a THIRD different thread, when he used computer
simulation to talk about a confidence interval, while neglecting
the basic concept of a Confidence Interval:

RF> I was casting pearl before swine by mentioning that a confidence
RF> interval is based on a ONE TIME sample, the theory of which
RF> came from that of a RANDOM INTERVAL surrounding a fixed
RF> but unknown parameter -- not something Afonso was toying with
RF> his worthless computer program.


Afonso, what's going to be your NEXT LIE and dishonest trick?

Get a life and get a rest, Luis A. Afonso.

-- Reef Fish Bob.

.

Relevant Pages