Re: curious usenet posting history stats
- From: "Reef Fish" <Dr_Bob_Ling@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 May 2006 22:42:16 -0700
espyrian wrote:
So I'm not allowed to vote, just because I'm an algorithm? I have
feelings, you know!!!
I had a follow-up post to this, which did not appear. It was
titled "TRUTH is stranger than FICTION".
Here's an abbreviated version of it.
I LOL at espyrian's remark.
Chris Chiasson had ONE post in sci.stat.math before 2005, in
which I did not participate.
Chris Chiasson's 2nd (life time) post in STM was his April post
to suggest voting me out of RTM.
His next post was urging Afonso to vote, and he made 5 other
posts in that thread.
His 3rd (life time) thread in sci.stat.math is the present thread,
in which, according to his own tabulation, Chris Chiasson and
Luis Afonso were the ONLY TWO who voted "yes" in Chiasson's
tabloid poll
What motivated Chiasson to post his THIRD thread in STM?
I think most readers can guess why.
I suppose I should be honored that Chris Chiasson, in his life
time, made a total of 9 posts in sci.stat.math, and 8 of the 9
were about ME (Reef Fish).
That was why I said,
That's another case of ... TRUTH is stranger than FICTION.
-- Bob.
.
- References:
- curious usenet posting history stats
- From: Chris Chiasson
- Re: curious usenet posting history stats
- From: espyrian
- curious usenet posting history stats
- Prev by Date: Re: Fine tune WINBUGS
- Next by Date: Re: Fine tune WINBUGS
- Previous by thread: Re: curious usenet posting history stats
- Next by thread: a question about PCA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|