Re: OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- From: "Lou Thraki" <louthraki@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 May 2006 06:42:28 -0700
Reef Fish wrote:
But if the explicit statement is allowed, the the IMPLIED
step should be obvious ( minus 1 as default) if the second argument
is less than the first. That is,
FOR Q = 0 TO -1
should mean the same as
FOR Q = 0 TO -1 STEP -1
Nonsens. The default implicit stepsize should always be 1.
You don't want that to be up to some arbitrary convention.
So a loop from 0 to -1 without explicit stepsize should be
skipped.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- References:
- OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- From: Reef Fish
- OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- Prev by Date: Someone
- Next by Date: Re: OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- Next by thread: Re: OT: The REAL RIddle of DO LOOPS Solved
- Index(es):