Re: Chi-Squared Test (goodness of fit) confidence levels
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2006 21:08:13 -0700
"Luis A. Afonso" wrote:
Old Mac User
Because to happens very rare event in MC (like 10, 0, 0,10) was not wasted.
In despite the methods difference the results are very similar which is a *clue* that you and me are right.
About WHAT?
-- Bob.
.
- References:
- Chi-Squared Test (goodness of fit) confidence levels
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: Chi-Squared Test (goodness of fit) confidence levels
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Chi-Squared Test (goodness of fit) confidence levels
- Prev by Date: avg(Randomize, reorder, subtract adjacent)?
- Next by Date: Re: The *Birthday* problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Chi-Squared Test (goodness of fit) confidence levels
- Next by thread: Re: Chi-Squared Test (goodness of fit) confidence levels
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|