Re: Comparing two variation coefficients
- From: Richard Ulrich <Rich.Ulrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:29:34 -0400
On 1 Jun 2006 17:39:03 -0700, "Reef Fish"
<Large_Nassau_Grouper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip, previous]
Now comes Richard Ulrich, the resident guru on all matters in
statistics:
RU> I'll take a shot at this. I have no special knowledge in
RU> the area,
RU> I've never consulted in this area,
the only disclaimer Richard Ulrich missed is the line that used
to be used by Ross C whenever he was talking through his hat:
Ross-C> Repeat disclaimer: I'm no expert statistician but that
rarely shuts me up.
Now that Ross-C is no longer participating in this group, I
suppose Richard Ulrich felt someone should fill Ross's shoes.
-- Bob.
- And that is how Reef Fish Bob Ling says,
"Thanks for giving me a good, informative, straight
and sufficient answer, even though I asked about the
coefficient of variation in a somewhat snooty and
sneering way that must repel Replies."
To that, I could have replied, "That's very gracious,
and you are welcome."
--
Rich Ulrich, wpilib@xxxxxxxx
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comparing two variation coefficients
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Comparing two variation coefficients
- References:
- Re: Comparing two variation coefficients
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: Comparing two variation coefficients
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Comparing two variation coefficients
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Hogg and Craig good?
- Next by Date: Most ABSURD One-Liners EVER posted in sci.stat.math
- Previous by thread: Re: Comparing two variation coefficients
- Next by thread: Re: Comparing two variation coefficients
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|