Re: Comparing two variation coefficients


Richard Ulrich wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 17:39:03 -0700, "Reef Fish"
<Large_Nassau_Grouper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip, previous]


Now comes Richard Ulrich, the resident guru on all matters in
statistics:

RU> I'll take a shot at this. I have no special knowledge in
RU> the area,

RU> I've never consulted in this area,

the only disclaimer Richard Ulrich missed is the line that used
to be used by Ross C whenever he was talking through his hat:

Ross-C> Repeat disclaimer: I'm no expert statistician but that
rarely shuts me up.

Now that Ross-C is no longer participating in this group, I
suppose Richard Ulrich felt someone should fill Ross's shoes.

-- Bob.


- And that is how Reef Fish Bob Ling says,

What kind of kook are you, Richard Ulrich, in this group?

I quote RU, and Ross C, verbatim in what Ulrich cited above.
to make my point.

Richard Ulrich, made up something in quotation, with no
attribution, but presumably said by me, according to Ulrich,
in his misguided obfuscation,

"Thanks for giving me a good, informative, straight
and sufficient answer, even though I asked about the
coefficient of variation in a somewhat snooty and
sneering way that must repel Replies."

To that, I could have replied, "That's very gracious,
and you are welcome."

So, now Richard Ulrich is talking to himself, while casting
his ad hominem attack about Bob Ling, the persona of
the only person posting in this thread , in this group,
Reef Fish Bob!

Richard Ulrich, do you have something worthwhile to say,
either on the subject of "coefficient of variation" or on my
quote of your own qualification you gave youself, for your
not-so-expert opinion on the subject?

RU> I'll take a shot at this. I have no special knowledge in
RU> the area,

RU> I've never consulted in this area,

-- Bob.

.

Relevant Pages

  • =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_To_the_OMU=B4s_care?=
    ... "Luis A. Afonso" wrote: ... (36 replies, so far) ... or any STATISTICS groups that has Richard Ulrich arguing against ... You are unwilling to explain to Richard Ulrich why a MODE is ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: ANOVA QUESTION - Terminology
    ... Depending on design, ... When Richard Ulrich mentioned something he said is "offered ... in every course or lext in experimental design" and indelicately ... Daniel, and characterized him as "not a household name in statistics, ...
    (sci.stat.consult)
  • Re: Time To Teach Digital Etiquette
    ... they bully OTHERS by making incessant NOISE in the group. ... I spared naming Richard Ulrich this time because Richard ... Quackery, Malpractice, and Ignorance about Statistics, ... The other NOISE makers, m00es, Illywhacker, Bob ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Scott Seidmans PURE NOISE on: "Non-linear regression problem"
    ... Richard Ulrich wrote: ... the substantive subject of nonlinear regression estimation is ... You failed to produce any evidence for your QUACKERY of using CV ... Statistics in 1938, long before I had used it, and he used it EXACTLY ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Chief Quack of sci.stat.math resorts to his NAME SMEARING tactic of "Bob Ling" again
    ... statistics curriculm because if you know your statistics, ... Richard Ulrich and Bob O'Hara. ... insisting referring to me as "Bob Ling" even though everyone KNOWS ... who also had 9 hits when search for "Fuck you Bob". ...
    (sci.stat.math)