Re: Richard Ulrich's SIXTH post to distort: His most UNETHICAL proposal to date -- inviting PRIVATE attacks OF Reef Fish Bob be sent to Ulrich

Just a correction of the SUBJECT to alleviate any possible
ambiguity or misunderstand of what I label Richards's
"unethical proposal" -- not just private email, but private email
specifically siding with him in his ongoing, gratuitous public
attacks.

Reef Fish wrote:
Richard Ulrich wrote:
On 4 Jun 2006 23:02:59 -0700, "Reef Fish"
<Large_Nassau_Grouper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Richard Ulrich wrote his repeated drivel.
[snip, rest]

Over the past weeks, I've delivered a few critical comments
that tested out some themes, so it is not totally new.

However, that is my first extended exposition of my
"Theory of Bob", and I expect to add to it in the future.
I welcome private e-mail on the Theory.

Why do you welcome private e-mail rather than PUBLIC posts,
since this IS a public matter about your malpractice and
gratuituous attack of something I repeated pointed readers
to read for THEMSELVES.

Richard, why do YOU have to interprete everything for everyone
and not let THEM decide for themselves?
The EVERYONE (and the "yourself") there meant every reader
in this newsgroup! Talk about me not reading well. Why should
readers in this group need Richard Ulrich's repeated coaching
for THEM to decide for themselves?

RF > EVERYONE is invited to read the first FOUR posts in the
RF > "linear regression" thread -- two by the OP Jens, and two
RF > responses by me, and judge for yourself the appropriateness
RF > or inappropriateness of my respons


Bob offers for inspection a rare combination of very strong
logic and very weak verbal reasoning. The latter is what I
am focussing on, and how it manifests despite high IQ.

I offered you to STOP your misguided ad hominem attack and
let the readers decide whether you had any leg to stand on
when you made your allegations.

The readers are also welcome to post PUBLICLY whatever
they find wrong with the two posts which I responded to Jens,
which was what he needed, and he expressed thanks about
my responses and the reference I gave.

Richard Ulrich is now trying to rally what remains of his dying
group of Blind Followers, in the form of "private e-mail" so that
Richard can use to say how much support he as gotten
(whether there is any or not) without revealing any substance
(or lack thereof) in this little underground group of supporters.

I can even count a few of them NOW: Luis A. Afonso, Old
Mac User, and Chris Chiasson whose only two posts this
year was trying to vote me out of sci.stat.math.

It any of them has anything they want to say about my role in
the "linear regression" thread answering to Jens, let them
speak up PUBLICLY.

This is an OPEN FORUM. Not a Fascist underground
movement of attack entirely related to any subject of statistics.

Of all the devious PUBLIC misrepresentations and attacks
Richard had shown since I started participating in sci.stat.math
in 2005, this latest move is the most UNETHICAL one, which
escalated from Richard's insistence to speak for others instead
of letting everyone speak out for themselves!

-- Bob.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Yo Gene!
    ... considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: ... thought the personal attack crap would not show up in your system. ... Why not just block everyone who posts OT? ... Harry is merely a symptom. ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Stay Big Mikey, down with cliques
    ... They attack Trout and Peyton yet, Trout has never uttered a single vulgarity ... I react only posts which attack me. ... I'm curious as to why you find a killfile to be a useful tool, ... observe and make my own determination of what's going on. ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: Stay Big Mikey, down with cliques
    ... I react only posts which attack me. ... Berman was an honored friend once, but unless he is worshipped, he has ... Those phone calls by BM and his insults toward female members of this ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: Good God, What Happened to this Group?
    ... >>>most of the posts are attacks on other sufferers. ... I'm all for more personal posts, ... >>>I can't abide blind items of attack from one member or another, ... >> All depends on what you mean by support. ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Sorry again.
    ... Having reading through some of his posts here it is ... attack anyone who criticises this behaviour. ... New to posting, not reading. ... As for the racism - again, ...
    (uk.people.consumers.ebay)