Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Gr0uper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Jul 2006 16:59:30 -0700
"Luis A. Afonso" wrote, in reply to Jack Tomsky:
_1__The goal is to compare the Distribution Variance with the Sample Variance. You are failing the goal because you did not define the Distribution you are dealing with.
Afonso, can't you understand simple English as in Jack's first line
below?
Jack> The sample variance depends only on the sample, not the cdf.
Jack> x(1) and x(2) are realizations from a sample of size two.
Jack's example was one of infinitely many COUNTEREXAMPLES
to your erroneous statement.
Do you got my *exasperation*?
_____licas (Luis A. Afonso)
I think by now, for ANYONE who has read just ONE of the dozen or
so corrections others made about your ERROR, or even if the
person had read ONLY your posts on this subject, that person
would have been thoroughly convinced not only of your total
ignorance in statistics, but the lack of any redeeming value in
ANY of your posts.
-- Reef Fish Bob.
.
- References:
- The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Prev by Date: Re: The sample sd always underestimates the Population sd
- Next by Date: Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Previous by thread: Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Next by thread: Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading