Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: "\"Luis A. Afonso\"" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:43:16 EDT
I wrote Posted Jul 8, 2006. 4:53 AM
***Population Mean value is under or overestimated by the Sample Mean. On contrary in what concerns standard deviations (and variances) we have always
____s.d. Sample < = s.d. Population
*
*
*
Therefore Population ssd >=Sample ssd.
To have the unbiased estimation of the Population variance (sigma the standard deviation) we must to divide the Sample ssd by n-1, to have the estimation of the Population ssd ***
My comment:
Seems Jack so dyslectic as Bob (Reef Fish)
I quote from Jack (YESTERDAY)
***Finally, Afonso, at long last you are starting to understand the differnece between a sample estimate and a parameter. All these hours I thought that I was wasting my time. Jack***
My response
Jack: You are so insolent and stupid as your *alter ego* Bob -Yurra.
____licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- References:
- The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Prev by Date: Looney Tunes: (was Re: Chi-squared Test of 2x2 tables, critical values)
- Next by Date: Re: Jack Tomsky shattered his PERFECT record on Afonso
- Previous by thread: Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Next by thread: Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Index(es):