Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Gr0uper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Jul 2006 23:35:25 -0700
Drunken Lunatic "Luis A. Afonso" wrote:
regarding the statement in the SUBJECT of the thread,
My comment:
Seems Jack so dyslectic as Bob (Reef Fish)
I quote from Jack (YESTERDAY)
***Finally, Afonso, at long last you are starting to understand the differnece between a sample estimate and a parameter. All these hours I thought that I was wasting my time. Jack***
My response
Jack: You are so insolent and stupid as your *alter ego* Bob -Yurra.
Bob-Yurra? You are so insolent and stupid, Afonso, that you
didn't shot your foot in your insults. It's Jack, Reef Fish Bob, and
Yurra whose name is NOT Bob.
____licas (Luis A. Afonso)
Wait till you sober up before you post again, Afonso!
-- Reef Fish Bob.
.
- References:
- The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Prev by Date: Re: Chi-squared Test of 2x2 tables, critical values
- Next by Date: The sum of square deviations: A THEOREM
- Previous by thread: Re: The sample s.d. always underestimates
- Next by thread: Probability question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|