Re: Piecewise constant approximation
- From: "erudite" <rmn711@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Jul 2006 07:26:39 -0700
Hi,
I am not interested in reconstructing the original signal. I wish to
find the approximation rate - how the MSE decays with n ? I could prove
that with lipschitz assumption the error decays as 1/n^2. Any ideas for
continuous bandlimited assumption ?
Thanks
john2 wrote:
erudite wrote:
Let s(t) be a continuous bandlimited signal. Let p(t) be its best
piecewise constant approximation on the uniformly partitioned unit
interval [0,1],
i.e p(t) = \sum_{i=1}^n c_i I_i(t)
where I_i(t) is the indicator function which takes 1 on the interval
[(i-1)/n , i/n) and 0 elsewhere.
Now how does the MSE ||s(t)-p(t)||^2 vary with n ?
Thanks,
er
Sounds like a book exercise ? The piecewise constant signal is not BL
but, if filtered properly, the original signal can be reconstructed
without error.
As a first approximation, calculate the spectral energy outside the
upper band limit of the original signal.
john2
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Piecewise constant approximation
- From: john2
- Re: Piecewise constant approximation
- From: David Jones
- Re: Piecewise constant approximation
- References:
- Piecewise constant approximation
- From: erudite
- Re: Piecewise constant approximation
- From: john2
- Piecewise constant approximation
- Prev by Date: Differing Scope and Methodology in GAO and University of California Reports Account for Variations in Cost Estimates for Homosexual Conduct Policy. GAO
- Next by Date: Re: Piecewise constant approximation
- Previous by thread: Re: Piecewise constant approximation
- Next by thread: Re: Piecewise constant approximation
- Index(es):