Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: "\"Luis A. Afonso\"" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:25:04 EDT
Jack said:
*** When you incorporated this notation in the statement of the hypotheses to be tested, you ended up claiming that under some circumstances, 8/13 <= 3/13. This is such a strange result that an explanation definitely is necessary. Jack***
My response :
You are absolutely right. This thread´s title should be:
***Th reason of a notation – The unnecessary explanation except for those persons lacking sensibility to understand what is going on***
___________licas (Luis A, Afonso)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: Jack Tomsky
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- References:
- The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Prev by Date: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Next by Date: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Previous by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Next by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Index(es):