WHY?

What is under discussion is H0: m=0 , that cannot be reached if the parameter under test is continuous but ON CONTRARY could very well happens in Court i. e. COMPLETE INOCENCE could be proved.

*** It was repeatable stated (by Bob Ling, see below) that the criminal court verdicts were exactly equal of a test of hypotheses decision ***
(This *jewel* , a diamante that’s mere glass, was stolen to Bob Ling, and he protests vehemently).

Why Bob Ling DOES NOT discs this point?
(The Readers know it VERY WELL)

____________licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Leibowitz Beethoven symphony cycle
    ... I got them quite inexpensively a couple of years on ebay in the ... Readers' Digest CD issues. ... and I think Readers' Digest may have issued a few discs from the set ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: How to burn Fedora DVDs to avoid readahead bug?
    ... multiple machines with different DVD writers, readers, etc. ... I've found their discs to be the best that I can buy, ...
    (Fedora)
  • =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_ECCE_HOMO_(to_the_OMU=C2=B4s_care)?=
    ... Bob Ling admits, finally, that is human, and so can be wrong. ... However the Readers should pay attention on the kind of error and its origin. ... What is a scandalous lie, ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: How could they foresee?
    ... If Bob Ling was a rational person (not a raving mad) I will ask him, s a do to the Readers, how can to put together this the following about the test comparing two proportions: ...
    (sci.stat.math)