Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: Jack Tomsky <jtomsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:13:41 EDT
After the intromission Bob Ling made (about *idlle*)
that I´m sure that you do not take into account (any
relevance, as usual, concerning
Probability-Statistics grounds) we can finish our
discussion now.
I ***hope*** you finally understood that my notation,
for example,
________p1 = 4 / 7___________p2 = 5 /10
is simple and provides all the information necessary
to perfom the test.
On contrary
_______p1 = 0.571__________p2 = 0.500
is insufficient and by this reason we do not go
further. The test cannot proceed unless the number of
trials and the successes are known.
_____________licas (Luis A. Afonso)
In "Never, Bob Ling, NEVER", Aug. 26, 2006, 4:37 AM, for instance, you defined the null and alternative hypotheses as
Ho: p1 = p2 and H1: p1 =/p2.
Therefore, if we are given that p1 = 0.571 and p2 = 0.500, that information is sufficient for us to know that H1 is true.
Jack
.
- References:
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for a distribution
- Next by Date: Norms of a IQ-test: percent range (PR) and z-score
- Previous by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Next by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
