Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).

From: "\"Luis A. Afonso\"" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:37:31 EDT

Jack said

*** In "Never, Bob Ling, NEVER", Aug. 26, 2006, 4:37 AM, for instance, you defined the null and alternative hypotheses as

Ho: p1 = p2 and H1: p1 =/p2.

Therefore, if we are given that p1 = 0.571 and p2 = 0.500, that information is sufficient for us to know that H1 is true.

Jack ***

NOY AT ALL

Suppose thé following problem :

*** Find if, concerning the observed success frequencies in two samples
_______________p1 = 0.571
_______________p2 = 0.500,
it can be stated H0 : p1= p2 (H1 = p1 not equal: p2) at the 95% confidence level ***

DO TRY

_____________licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
  - From: Jack Tomsky
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
  - From: Reef Fish

References:
- The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
  - From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"

Prev by Date: Norms of a IQ-test: percent range (PR) and z-score
Next by Date: Hypothesis Testing vs US Criminal Court (was Re: WHY?)
Previous by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
Next by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread