Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: Jack Tomsky <jtomsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:00:42 EDT
Jack said
*** In "Never, Bob Ling, NEVER", Aug. 26, 2006, 4:37
AM, for instance, you defined the null and
alternative hypotheses as
Ho: p1 = p2 and H1: p1 =/p2.
Therefore, if we are given that p1 = 0.571 and p2 =
0.500, that information is sufficient for us to know
that H1 is true.
Jack ***
NOY AT ALL
Suppose thé following problem :
*** Find if, concerning the observed success
frequencies in two samples
_______________p1 = 0.571
_______________p2 = 0.500,
it can be stated H0 : p1= p2 (H1 = p1 not equal:
p2) at the 95% confidence level ***
DO TRY
_____________licas (Luis A. Afonso)
Since you told me what p1 and p2 are, I can state with 100% confidence that H1 is true.
Jack
.
- References:
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Prev by Date: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Next by Date: Re: how to calculate this?
- Previous by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Next by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Index(es):