Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Gr0uper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 12:55:16 -0700
"Luis A. Afonso" wrote:
Jack said
*** In "Never, Bob Ling, NEVER", Aug. 26, 2006, 4:37 AM, for instance, you defined the null and alternative hypotheses as
Ho: p1 = p2 and H1: p1 =/p2.
Therefore, if we are given that p1 = 0.571 and p2 = 0.500, that information is sufficient for us to know that H1 is true.
Jack ***
NOY AT ALL
Suppose thé following problem :
*** Find if, concerning the observed success frequencies in two samples
_______________p1 = 0.571
_______________p2 = 0.500,
it can be stated H0 : p1= p2 (H1 = p1 not equal: p2) at the 95% confidence level ***
DO TRY
_____________licas (Luis A. Afonso)
You posted THREE posts of complete nonsense to Jack Tomsky's one
telling you the same blunder you had been committing.
Your FREE TUITION from me had been withdrawn.
You are therefore no longer no eligible for my teaching whose time
I had freely given to the Charible Foundation for the Loonies.
I am now enjoying a cruise on those funds.
Buenos dias, bonjour, und guten morgan, to herr Luis A. Afonso,
-- Reef Fish Bob.
.
- References:
- The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Prev by Date: Re: Who wants to discuss this point?
- Next by Date: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Previous by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Next by thread: Re: The reason of a notation (The unnecessary explanation).
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
